The Opener Is Over. Now the Real Work Starts.

There is something funny about how much energy we put into opening weekend.

For months, everything points toward one date. We buy gear, organize trailers, brush blinds, train dogs, scout fields, check batteries, rig decoys and talk about the opener like the entire waterfowl season depends on what happens during those first couple mornings. Then suddenly it’s Monday, the alarm has gone off a few times, the guns have finally been fired at something other than clays, Ember has gotten her first real work of the fall, and there are muddy waders hanging somewhere they probably shouldn’t be.

After all that anticipation, though, I think this is actually one of my favorite points of the season.

Because now we have information.

Everything we spent the summer thinking about has finally been tested against real birds. The spreads we imagined in the garage have actually been sitting in front of ducks and geese. Ember has experienced the difference between another training session and an actual hunt. The gear has been carried into the field instead of neatly stacked in the trailer. We’ve had opportunities to see what worked, what didn’t, and what sounded like a great idea in July but suddenly seemed a lot less important at five in the morning.

That’s what I like about this point in September. We’re finally done guessing.

The Birds Just Graded Our Summer

You can practice almost everything involved in waterfowl hunting, but eventually real birds have to grade the test. That’s especially true with a dog. We can throw bumpers for Ember all summer, work steadiness and obedience, practice retrieves and introduce as much hunting context as possible, but there is no way to completely recreate what happens when real birds suddenly appear over the decoys.

A bumper doesn’t flap on the water. It doesn’t dive. It doesn’t sail another 60 yards after everybody thought it was dead. Six bumpers don’t suddenly come ripping across the marsh while guns are going off, people are moving and another flock is already approaching before you’ve finished dealing with the first one.

Real hunting exposes things that training can’t.

The same is true for us. Opening weekend has a way of showing which systems actually work and which ones only worked in our heads. A blind might not be as easy to brush as we thought. The decoys might take longer to deploy than expected. Something that had a perfect place in the trailer might be impossible to find when three people are digging through gear in the dark. We might carry 40 pounds of equipment into a spot and realize we only needed about six pounds of it.

I don’t really look at those things as failures anymore. They’re information.

The mistake is assuming every problem requires us to add something. Waterfowl hunters are incredibly good at solving problems by buying more stuff. Birds didn’t finish, so maybe we need another dozen decoys. We didn’t like the hide, so maybe we need another blind. The trailer got messy, so apparently the answer is six more totes.

Sometimes new equipment really does solve a problem, but a lot of times the answer is much simpler. Move the blind. Take fewer decoys. Change the landing hole. Leave earlier. Spend another hour scouting. Work with Ember on the one thing that became obvious during the hunt instead of trying to improve ten things at once.

The opener doesn’t necessarily tell us what we need to buy. It tells us what we need to improve.

Early teal are particularly good at exposing those weaknesses because everything happens so quickly. They can go from nonexistent to screaming across the decoys before you’re completely ready, and there isn’t much time for a complicated plan once they arrive. You need to be hidden, you need a spread that gives them somewhere obvious to go, everybody needs to know their shooting lanes, and the dog needs to understand her job.

That simplicity is actually refreshing.

I’ve spent a lot of this summer thinking about systems, bigger goose spreads, different decoy combinations, motion, blinds, trailer organization and scouting routes. Then September arrives and a handful of teal remind you how much fun waterfowl hunting can be with a small pile of decoys, a shotgun and a dog sitting next to you.

Sometimes I need that reminder.

September Is Already Teaching Us What Fall Might Look Like

One of the things I want to avoid this season is assuming that because a spot was good last year, it will automatically be good again. Waterfowl hunting changes too quickly for that.

Water levels change. Food changes. Crops change. Vegetation changes. Pressure changes. A little wetland that looked mediocre last fall might be fantastic this year, while a place we couldn’t wait to return to might not hold nearly the same number of birds.

That’s why I want to pay attention to habitat while we’re scouting, not just birds.

If we find shallow water with good food surrounded by areas that are drying up, that location goes into the memory bank even if it isn’t covered in ducks today. The birds we’re hunting now aren’t necessarily the birds we’ll be hunting three or four weeks from now. September is the beginning of a much larger movement, and some of the places that don’t look exciting yet might become extremely important when new birds start arriving.

That mindset also changes how I think about pressure.

We have a long season ahead of us, and there is no reason every September hunt needs to be treated like the hunt of the year. If we find a few family groups of geese using a field, I don’t automatically want to throw everything we own at them. If a small spread will do the job, that’s what I want to use. If conditions aren’t right, sometimes the best decision might be to leave them alone.

That last one is difficult.

Finding birds creates this strange urgency where you feel like you have to hunt them before somebody else does. Sometimes that’s probably true, especially when we’re hunting areas with plenty of pressure, but every hunt also teaches birds something. Every truck driving into a field, every volley, every blind that suddenly appears and every decoy spread they survive becomes another little piece of education.

September geese might tolerate mistakes that November geese absolutely will not.

I want us thinking about that now rather than after we’ve already burned the places we were excited about.

Bigger Decoy Collection, Smaller Spreads

Ironically, after spending so much time building our goose spread this year, I’m becoming increasingly interested in seeing how little of it we can get away with using.

I’m extremely excited about the DSD spread we’ve put together. Between the Giants and Maximas and all the different feeders, resters, sleepers, uprights and floaters, we have more options than we’ve ever had before. We can build some serious pulling power when the situation calls for it.

But owning more decoys doesn’t mean every hunt needs more decoys.

For local September geese, I’m really interested in matching what we’re actually seeing during the scout. If the field is being used by small family groups, why automatically put out four dozen geese? Maybe six or ten really good decoys with plenty of space between them look more natural. Maybe a few feeders with several relaxed birds nearby tell exactly the story those geese expect to see.

Later in the season, when we’re trying to traffic migrating birds or create visibility across a big field, that larger spread is going to have its day. That’s why we built it. But right now, realism might be more important than volume.

The same lesson applies to teal and eventually regular-season ducks. I don’t want to hunt according to the amount of gear we own. I want to hunt according to what the birds are doing.

If that means two dozen decoys, great.

If it means six, even better.

The point of having options is being able to choose the right one, not feeling obligated to use all of them.

Danielle would probably appreciate that philosophy considering she has watched the amount of waterfowl gear around our place grow all summer. I’m not sure she’ll believe I’ve actually embraced simplicity until she sees me leave a pile of decoys at home on purpose.

Fair enough.

Ember’s Season Has Actually Started Now

The part of this season I might be most excited about has nothing to do with the number of birds we shoot.

It’s Ember.

There is something different about watching your own dog begin connecting months of training with the real thing. Danielle and I will remember the birds from these hunts, but I have a feeling some of the moments that stick with us the longest are going to be Ember’s.

The first retrieve where you can almost see everything click. The first cripple she tracks down that reminds us why all those training sessions mattered. The first time she stays completely steady while everything around her gets chaotic.

And, undoubtedly, the first time she does something completely ridiculous and Danielle gives me that look that says, Your hunting dog is doing great.

Those moments are coming too.

What I don’t want to do is judge Ember’s entire season by what happens in September. She’s still learning how all of this works in the real world, and that means there will be mistakes. What matters is that we’re paying attention to them and using the time between hunts to work on what actually needs improvement.

If steadiness becomes the issue, we’ll work steadiness. If delivery gets sloppy, we’ll clean up delivery. If excitement causes obedience to disappear, then that’s what gets our attention.

Not ten things at once.

One thing.

Real hunting exposes the holes, and training between hunts gives us an opportunity to patch them.

I also want to remember that we’re asking a lot from a hunting dog during these first few outings. Everything is exciting. Everything smells different. Real birds behave differently than training bumpers, and the environment itself can be distracting. The goal isn’t to manufacture a perfect dog in one weekend.

The goal is to make every hunt another useful repetition.

By November, hopefully we can look back at September and see how far she’s come.

The Details We Forget Are Usually the Ones We Need

The other thing I want to get much better at this season is documenting what actually happened during our hunts.

Most hunters remember the big stuff. We remember killing birds in a certain field. We remember the morning the teal were stacked in a little pond. We remember that one northwest wind where everything seemed to work perfectly.

What we forget are the details that actually explain why it worked.

What time did the birds arrive? What was the wind actually doing? Where did the first flock try to land? How many decoys did we use? Which side of the spread did they favor? Did they react to calling? Did the motion help? Where exactly was the blind? What changed after the first shots?

A week later, we probably remember most of it.

A year later, we remember the story.

Those are two very different things.

That’s why I’m becoming increasingly interested in logging what we’re seeing instead of simply recording what we killed. I want to know what changed during the hunt and whether that change actually affected the birds. I want to compare hunts instead of relying on my memory of them.

One hunt doesn’t tell us much. Ten hunts start showing patterns. After enough hunts, those little observations might completely change how we approach certain winds, habitats or types of birds.

And the interesting part is that the best hunt isn’t necessarily the one that teaches us the most.

A six-bird limit can sometimes tell you almost nothing because everything simply worked.

A terrible hunt can expose five things you never would have noticed otherwise.

That’s valuable information if we’re willing to pay attention to it.

We’re Finally Hunting Instead of Getting Ready to Hunt

That’s what feels different now.

For most of the summer, waterfowl season existed in our heads. We were building spreads for birds we hadn’t seen yet, organizing equipment for hunts that hadn’t happened, training Ember for situations we could only try to recreate and talking about how we thought everything would work.

Now we know a little more.

The first hunts have happened. The birds have reacted. Ember has gotten real repetitions. The gear has gotten dirty. Some ideas worked exactly the way we hoped, and I’m sure others are already going to change.

That’s the good part.

Opening weekend was never supposed to be the finish line. It was the first field test.

Now we get to take what worked, fix what didn’t, simplify what became unnecessarily complicated and keep scouting.

September is still young. Early goose season is underway, the regular duck opener is coming, migration will start changing the birds we’re seeing, and before long we’ll be looking at cold fronts instead of warm September mornings.

There is a lot of season ahead of us.

By the time the real push of fall arrives, I want our setups cleaner than they are now. I want Ember better than she is today. I want our scouting sharper. I want less unnecessary gear coming into the marsh, and I want us making decisions based on what we’ve actually observed instead of what we assumed would happen back in July.

That’s why I like this point in the season so much.

The anticipation is over.

The first lessons are in.

And we’re finally done getting ready to hunt waterfowl.

Now we get to actually become better waterfowl hunters.

– Max & Danielle
Burley Outdoors

Leave a comment